license

Creative Commons License
Where the stuff on this blog is something i created it is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License so there are no requirements to attribute - but if you want to mention me as the source that would be nice :¬)
Showing posts with label talent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label talent. Show all posts

Monday, 19 January 2015

the @c_of_e #discerning and #nurturing senior #leaders paper - its headlines, arguments & how real is the consultation

A paper with this title - for the February 2015 Synod - became available on line last Friday.  It prefaces the earlier (December 2014) issued Talent Management report (here is my summary of that report) 

Below I headline what the paper says.  Where I make comments (as distinct from the facts of what happened or summarising what the paper says) I have indicated these via red coloured font.

Below those headlines are two further sections - the first - by way of reminder - sets out how the Talent Management Report was revealed.  The second section summarises in more detail what the paper says.

And just to note - at the very foot of this post are links to my posts summarising all the recent January 2015 CofE reports and other related CofE posts on stats/conferences/etc. etc.






Headlines from the Discerning and Nurturing Senior Leaders Paper

1) We want to be more diverse in wider leadership roles

2) We aren't just adopting management speak and theory

3) It is irresponsible not to manage our talent

4) We will review and refine content in light of earlier consultation, suggestions via social media and the hearing at Synod  

(Yet the 1st mini-MBA for Deans is in March 2015, Partners have been selected to design and deliver the programmes, detailed design is underway and arrangements for identifying participants are underway (paras 14, 16 & 19) - which perhaps is why - unlike the other papers - there is not a discussion forum on the CofE website.  Also given that such actions/decisions are already underway/have been made - then if the February  2015 Synod raises fundamental issues that will be awkward)




How the Talent Management Report was revealed



1) the 12/12/14 Church Times reported on what it described as an "unpublished" CofE report on "talent management".  

2) The article quoted a spokeperson as saying "Details will be published next month" (although given the structure of the article's paragraph this quote might have been referring to either the report or the implementation plan). 

3) A fair amount of the initial reaction to the Report - as the Church Times article reported on it - was unfavourable (a list of posts reacting to the report is at the foot of this post)

4) on 16/12/14  Justin Welby issued a response.  Plus on the CofE website there was (16/12) A Note from the Bishop of Ely on “The Green Report”. The key arguments set out in those 2 documents defending the proposals are reflected in the latest "Discerning & Nurturing" paper - indeed often the exact same phrases are used

5) Soon after the report became available - and despite the reported "published next month" quote in 2) above - the report became available online



A bit more detail on the Key points set out in the Discerning and Nurturing Paper


Purpose of the Paper 

1) The paper; 

a) sets "the proposals in their wider context";

b) connects "the theological underpinning of this work with the organisational language of the proposals";

c) creates "space to explore the various issues and concerns that have arisen";

d) provides "an update on the detailed design.
(all quotes from para 2 page 1)



Consultation and Review 

2) Paragraph 7 on page 2 of the paper reports as follows:

a) "Over the Autumn DAG has been testing and exploring themes to inform the detailed design through regional bishops meetings, the Dean’s Conference, a meeting with Directors of Ministry, the Archbishops’ Council as well as reviewing the suggestions that have emerged through social media."

b) "The hearing at Synod will be an additional forum for this. Content is being reviewed and refined in the light of such discussions."


3) This all looks hopeful in terms of listening to the various reactions to the Talent Management report.  However that hope is somewhat dented when paragraphs 14, 16 and 19 of the paper are read

a) "Partners have been selected to design and deliver the leadership programmes" (para 14 page 4), 

b) "The first programme is the mini-MBA for Deans and this will be held 23 – 27 March 2015.  Detailed design work for the other programmes is underway and invitations have been been issued. (para 16 page 4)

c) Arrangements for identifying the participants for the 2015 development programme are underway and the framework for this discernment process set out in the report is being piloted. (para 19 page 4)



Arguments set out in the report to support Talent Management

It is irresponsible not to manage our talent
4) "The absence of a process for the proper development for posts of wider responsibility is arguably an abdication of our duty to care for those called to this ministry. (para 5 page 2)

5) "These proposals are, fundamentally, to do with the responsible stewardship of the gifts
God has given for ministry". (para 6 page 2)

6) "To fail to prepare those who may be called to posts of wider responsibility is to put unreasonable stress on them and means that we are neglecting to love them as we are called to do.  (para 11 page 3)


We want to be more diverse
7) "A key aim of the programme is to enable the Church to deliver its commitment to diversity and difference in wider leadership roles. This is reflected in the emphasis on interdisciplinary learning and the creation of a ‘community of practice’ across a diverse pool of clergy - theologians, community shapers, evangelists and parish priests. In addition, the
commitments made in the Guiding Principles, and to increased BAME representation in
leadership need to be lived out in action" (para 12 page 3)


We aren't just adopting management speak and theory 
8) "The identity of the Church is rooted in, and renewed by, continuing dynamic and prayerful engagement with scripture in each new context, in response to new questions and challenges. Formed by the biblical and living theological tradition, and seeking to proclaim the Gospel afresh in each new generation, the Church sifts, evaluates and, where appropriate, engages in what the FAOC Report calls “critical appropriation” of
theoretical insights drawn from organisational theories and praxis beyond the biblical-theological traditions. It is often in ‘the voice from without’, from beyond our known
discipline or path of discipleship, that the renewing and challenging word will spring.
Participants will be encouraged to engage critically and theologically with lively insights
offered by professors from INSEAD and the Judge Business School Cambridge". (para 8 page 2)






Related CofE Posts

CofE Discerning & nurturing paper - with Green Report attached - from January 2015

CofE Resourcing the Future - from January 2015

CofE Simplification paper - from January 2015

CofE Developing Discipleship paper - from January 2015

“In Each Generation” : A programme for reform and renewal - from January 2015

The Green Report - on CofE talent management - from December 2014

CofE typos in services - a compilation of a @OurCofE twitter hashtag - from December 2014

CofE 2013 mission stats - from November 2014

Household of faith conference - one of several posts summarising - from July 2014

CofE Strategies - one of several posts summarising - from June/July 2014

Role of church in society conference - from June 2014

CofE church growth research conference - from January 2014



Tuesday, 16 December 2014

13 key points from the @c_of_e 's Green Report (with page no. refs) on #Talent Management -

A quick reminder of how the report was 1st revealed

The 12/12/14 Church Times reported on what it described as an "unpublished" CofE report on "talent management".  

The article quoted a spokeperson as saying 

"Details will be published next month" 

(although given the structure of the article's paragraph this might be referring to either the report or the implementation plan). 

I blogged about what the article said & included links to others posts on 13/12/14.   My impression from tweets from people on my 2800 strong CofE twitter list is that a lot of the initial reaction to the Report was not positive.

It's possible that the Church Times article revealed the report's contents earlier than CofE HQ intended. That might explain why  - despite signing the report off -  Justin Welby has now (16/12)  issued a response.  Plus on the CofE website there is now (16/12) A Note from the Bishop of Ely on “The Green Report”

The Archbishops have been silent in public on it even though they challenged the review

" to be sufficiently radical and imaginative in response to new contexts" (p3) 

AND the report recommended that 

"It is important for the Archbishops to lead the communication to the broader Church regarding why changes are required at this point in time"

I read the report yesterday - as thanks to Thinking Anglicans I found a copy of it on their website. The full title is "Talent Management for Future Leaders and Leadership Development for Bishops and Deans:A New Approach".  Lots of people refer to it as the Green report (after Lord Green who chaired the Steering Committee).

Almost at the foot of this posts are links to other people's posts on the Talent Report

And at the very foot of this post are links to my summarises of the recent January 2015 CofE reports and other related CofE posts on stats/conferences/etc. etc

So here goes with the summary .....



SUMMARY HEADLINES



1) The intention - to develop clergy of exceptional leadership potential

2) Investment needed - of £2.1m 2014/16 plus £0.8m p.a. in 2017 & thereafter

3) Theology and context - some headlines of the thinking:

- "We intend to form clergy who integrate and demonstrate strategic and spiritual gifts";

- "Without the visible resilience of the body corporate, the Church, the name of Jesus dies on the nation’s lips";

- "Generous and visible servants of Jesus" and "radical and ambitious as holy people";   

- "We are advocating the embrace of credible risk as an integral part of our adventure in Christ"

4) A new Talent Development Programme - "Talent Pool" aimed at up to 150 people 

5) Leadership Characteristics of Bishops & Deans - described under headings like: Common Good; Re-shaping Ministry; and Leading Growth

6) Mandatory Induction Process for diocesan & suffragan bishops - replacing a voluntary one

7) New induction programme for deans - replacing the current ad hoc arrangements

8) 36 diocesan bishops to complete a modular development programme - in 2015/16

9) Mini MBA programme in 2015/16 for 60 individuals - targeted primarily at deans

10) New Contributing to the Common Good Programme - in 2015/16 for 54 individuals (bishops or deans)

11) Suffragan bishops role - may have implications for future programmes design

12) Standardised MDR process - for senior clergy across the Church with more objectivity, transparency and detail

13 ) Alignment of criteria - for ordination, development of priests in their 1st years of ministry and talent identification




MORE DETAILED SUMMARY


1) The intention - is to develop clergy of exceptional leadership potential to make a significant impact in every area of the Church’s endeavour AND to be more open to the emergence of leaders from a wider variety of backgrounds and range of skills than is currently predictable (p5)


2) Investment required for the new approach - £2.1m 2014/16 plus £0.8m p.a. in 2017 & thereafter (p3)


3) Theological exploration of principles and context - is set on pages 4-9 of the report.  I have picked out a couple of themes to give a sense of some of the issues covered.

Spiritual and Strategic

"We intend to form clergy who integrate and demonstrate strategic and spiritual gifts" (p6)

"Being spiritual and strategic go together in witness and action ...... organisational flourishing is as necessary a springboard as active mission. Without the visible resilience of the body corporate, the Church, the name of Jesus dies on the nation’s lips". (p7)

Generous and visible servants of Jesus, radical and ambitious as holy people

"The Church’s ordained leaders are called to be generous and visible servants of Jesus Christ who enable abundant living in individuals, Church and community by making Christ known.  They are called to be radical and ambitious as holy people who are single-minded in their desire to ensure that their leadership serves the building of the kingdom of God (p7)

Embracing credible risk as an integral part of our adventure in Christ.

"We are advocating the embrace of credible risk as an integral part of our adventure in Christ. We are proposing a radical step change in our development of leaders who can shape and articulate a compelling vision and who are skilled and robust enough to create spaces of safe uncertainty in which the Kingdom grows. (p7)

"The Faith and Order Commission’s document on leadership speaks of ‘faithful improvisation’ as a key characteristic of Christian leadership. This is exactly what this plan promotes." (p5)

Professional clergy - sociological realities and transcendent values and principles

 'Profession' in a clergy context is both a group of people who operate according to conventions and practices developed by the group; and on the other, a group that professes a set of transcendent values and principles which derive from a theology of vocation (p5)


4) A new Talent Development Programme  - aimed at up to 150 people who have demonstrated exceptional performance AND potential over a sustained period of time to undertake key strategic leadership roles for Gospel, Kingdom and Church impact in the future. (p16). Average duration of membership will be 5 years. After the start up around 30 individuals a year will become alumni as they leave the pool (p17). P20 &21 have more detail on what happens in each of the 5 years.

Identifying Candidates for the talent pool  - is done as part of an annual review held by each diocesan bishop (p18). In doing so they consider the types of potential indicators in the lower half of the diagram below (also see p29, 30 & 31).  


The annual review meeting will categorise high potential individuals in terms of: a) Early Promise - 'ones to watch'; b) Exceptional Potential; c) Ready Now for Episcopal Ministry.

Applying to be in the talent pool - once candidates are identified and agree to apply, then their diocesan bishop completes a nomination statement including a detailed, evidence based report (p18).  The candidate also completes a form including a self-appraisal of strengths and development needs, their perspective on the fit with talent programme, references and recent MDR (p19)

Selecting which candidates should be invited to a discernment panel - the Development and Appointments Group (DAG) considers the documentation to ensure nominations are of consistent calibre across the dioceses.  DAC filter out nominations where the documentation provided does not demonstrate sustained evidence of exceptional potential. DAG will ensure decisions at this stage are moderated across its’ membership.(p19) and agrees to progress a candidate to the Discernment Panel.

Discernment Panel - Candidates attend for 1 day with a series of assessments, and interviews to evaluate their suitability.  Assessors at the panel will be appointed by the Archbishops, and include a mix of lay and ordained individuals drawn from across the diversity of the Church of England. (p19).  Assessors will advise the Archbishops, via DAG, which individuals should be offered a place on the programme and provide a written feedback report for all individuals who participate in a selection panel, highlighting key strengths and development areas. (p20)

After the Talent Pool - Over time an alumni network (overseen by DAG) will develop as individuals complete the programme.  This will be supported by resource from the senior appointments and development teams and there will be invitations to relevant meetings and specific development events designed for the network. (p21)


5) Leadership Characteristics - Bishops & Deans  (p10)

6) Mandatory Induction Process for diocesan and suffragan bishops - So a change from the current voluntary individual focussed approach to a mandatory process "that examines key organisational and mission areas in depth, both locally and nationally."  Within a year of appointment all bishops and deans will attend a guided spiritual retreat. (p15)


7) New induction programme for deans - replacing the current ad hoc arrangements.  This also includes a recommendation that newly appointed suffragan bishops and deans should be allocated a mentor  (p15). 


8) 36 diocesan bishops to complete a modular development programme in 2015/16 (p10) - covering 3 modules as described in the diagram above (and further in p12 & 13).  "Initially, diocesan bishops will be the priority participants on the first leadership programme. The expectation is that suffragan bishops and deans will be drawn into full participation in the whole programme". (p6).


9) Mini MBA programme in 2015/16 for 60 individuals targeted primarily at deans (p11) - but also open to bishops and possibly archdeacons – egs of content include: finance; building high performance teams; a field trip to a see how a non-Church heritage sites is run (p13)


10) New Contributing to the Common Good Programme in 2015/16 for 54 individuals (bishops or deans) (p11) - egs of content includes: advanced communications skills training, including the digital media; Case Studies on successful partnering with secular bodies (p13)


11) Suffragan bishops role and the programmes set out in the Green report  - the leadership lens of the Green report project has underlined the complexity of the suffragan role.  A Dioceses Commission symposium in October 2014, developed in conjunction with FAOC and DAG, may stimulate further work in this area which will have implications for future programme design.(p24).   


12) Standardised MDR process for senior clergy across the Church with more objectivity, transparency and detail - performance management should provide the foundation for talent management and leadership development activity. (p23)  "Currently there is some difference in focus between Lambeth and Bishopthorpe and future work will be required to establish a common vision for the scheme and to ensure that a re-designed Archbishops’ MDR Scheme is aligned with the new leadership characteristics" (p25)


13) Alignment of criteria for ordination, development of priests in their 1st years of ministry and talent identification - there is an obvious overlap between the criteria for each of these.  They are not yet fully aligned and more work will be required between the Wash House and Ministry Division. (p23)





Other's posts/resources on this subject - in date order

Paul Handley in the Church Times - the original article  (12/12)

The report itself (sated September 2104) - on the Thinking Anglicans website (12/12 - and on the CofE site 16/12)

Senior Church Leadership A Resource for Reflection - found via Thinking Anglicans (date unknown  - but the Green report refers to it)


artsy honker - cofe throwing money at the wrong problem (12/12)


rachell mann - these are not the leaders you are looking for (12/12)


martyn percy - are these the leaders that we really want? (12/12)


richard murphy - Should the Church of England really be taking a lead from Lord Stephen Green? (13/12)

me - why can't they publish it before January? (13/12)

michael sadgrove - The Next Generation of Church Leaders: thoughts on the Green Report (14/12)

andrew lightbrown - An open letter to Lord Green et al (14/12)


archdruid eilleen - infecting the church with mangerialism (15/12)

archbishop cranmer - cofe to spend £2m on new approach to leadership (15/12)

ian paul - should bishops come from a 'talent pool' ?' (15/12)

ruth gledhill - Can business training solve CofE's 'toxic' leadership problem? (15/12)

victhevicar - C of E to groom talent for top jobs: Leading Growth (16/12)

justin welby - a response (16/12)

bishop of ely - a note  (16/12)

pete wilcox - a reflection from a member of the group (16/12)

Theore0 - fallen angels & slippery slopes (6/1/15)

opinionated vicar - in praise of the green report (7/1/15)




Related CofE Posts

CofE Discerning & nurturing paper - with Green Report attached - from January 2015

Church Commissioners' funds and inter-generational equity - from January 2015


CofE Resourcing the Future - from January 2015


CofE Resourcing Ministerial Education - from January 2015


CofE Simplification paper - from January 2015

CofE Developing Discipleship paper - from January 2015

“In Each Generation” : A programme for reform and renewal - from January 2015

The Green Report - on CofE talent management - from December 2014

CofE typos in services - a compilation of a @OurCofE twitter hashtag - from December 2014


CofE 2013 mission stats - from November 2014

Household of faith conference - one of several posts summarising - from July 2014


CofE Strategies - one of several posts summarising - from June/July 2014

Role of church in society conference - from June 2014

CofE church growth research conference - from January 2014