south cambridgeshire (uk) based explorer - i post stuff i think is ok. sometimes i create summaries of others stuff. now & then I'll create content when inspired. it keeps me amused.
license
Where the stuff on this blog is something i created it is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License so there are no requirements to attribute - but if you want to mention me as the source that would be nice :¬)
Showing posts with label chernobyl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chernobyl. Show all posts
Monday, 19 April 2021
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
Sunday, 24 August 2014
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
the uk & chernobyl - the situation in 1997 - so whats it like now? - 5 things re the 1997 stats to think about
the source of the summary below is the ever excellent uk parliament notes
1) 7 years later (1997), areas of the UK remained contaminated with radioactive fall-out from Chernobyl, to the extent that the movement and slaughter of almost 1/2 million sheep on more than 600 farms were still subject to restrictions.
2) the average Chernobyl fallout dose per person in Cumbria was 6 times the UK average.
3) Radioactive caesium can remain unbound if it is readily taken up by plants and thence into animals. Caesium can then become continuously recycled; i.e. excreted by animals, re-incorporated into plants, re-ingested by animals and so on. The following soil factors all tend to increase caesium uptake into plants (and thus animals): Low clay content; High acidity; Low mineral (especially potassium) content; high organic content - this retains 'free' caesium near the surface (where it is taken up by roots) ; Waterlogging - increases the ‘pool’ of mobile caesium
4) Earlier experience with caesium fallout from nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and '60s suggests that upland soils may take as long as 30 years to immobilise most of the caesium
5) Since Chernobyl it has become increasingly apparent that many of the 60 or so nuclear reactors of Soviet design still operating in Eastern and Central Europe do not conform to Western standards. The main safety concerns relate to inadequate containment and emergency core cooling systems, although there are also doubts about standards of construction and operating methods (which may lead to premature ageing of the reactor).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)